<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reconciliation Needed.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writing.giantangrysquid.com/smut/?feed=rss2&#038;p=175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writing.giantangrysquid.com/smut/?p=175</link>
	<description>pictures from the peepshow - see the about page</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:56:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: suraya</title>
		<link>http://writing.giantangrysquid.com/smut/?p=175&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>suraya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writing.giantangrysquid.com/smut/?p=175#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hiya! Just popped over from Warren Ellis&#039;s blog to read your thoughts on Filament.

The types of objections to porn you are talking about are pretty much what made me start Filament. I thought quite hard about what objectification is and tried to avoid it - but you won&#039;t see that through sample images because it&#039;s about context - which is why Filament is a magazine not a website.

We certainly haven&#039;t photoshopped any models&#039; nipples, but you&#039;re right that the photography could be better. It is a huge challenge, especially as we have no money to pay photographers with and there are so few photographers working in this field. I think the photography in Issue 2 is tons better though.

You should start your own porn company! There is just not enough stuff out there genuinely aimed at women, and I find it frustrating that Filament, as the only mag on the market at the minute, is expected to cater to every woman&#039;s desires.

Anyway thanks for caring enough to write something about our teeny wee fledgling magazine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya! Just popped over from Warren Ellis&#8217;s blog to read your thoughts on Filament.</p>
<p>The types of objections to porn you are talking about are pretty much what made me start Filament. I thought quite hard about what objectification is and tried to avoid it &#8211; but you won&#8217;t see that through sample images because it&#8217;s about context &#8211; which is why Filament is a magazine not a website.</p>
<p>We certainly haven&#8217;t photoshopped any models&#8217; nipples, but you&#8217;re right that the photography could be better. It is a huge challenge, especially as we have no money to pay photographers with and there are so few photographers working in this field. I think the photography in Issue 2 is tons better though.</p>
<p>You should start your own porn company! There is just not enough stuff out there genuinely aimed at women, and I find it frustrating that Filament, as the only mag on the market at the minute, is expected to cater to every woman&#8217;s desires.</p>
<p>Anyway thanks for caring enough to write something about our teeny wee fledgling magazine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
